It is not just an ability to choose . This is known as being Gillick competent. When prescribing contraception to children under 16 it is important to assess for coercion or pressure, for example coercion by an older partner. Subscribe to our weekly email keeping you up-to-date with all the developments in child protection policy, research, practice and guidance. The means by which to assess legal capacity in children under the age of 16 years, established in the case Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority (1985) 2 A11 ER 402. Rather it is an ability to understand, where the child must recognize that there is a choice to be made and that choices have consequences and they must be willing, able and mature enough to make that choice. This article considers the requirements for Gillick competence, it highlights the factors that must be considered when determining whether a child is competent to give consent to treatment. This test is known as the Gillick competence test. In Northern Ireland, although separate legislation applies, the then Department of Health and Social Services stated that there was no reason to suppose that the House of Lords decision would not be followed by the Northern Ireland courts. Gillick competency and Fraser guidelines help people who work with children to balance the need to listen to children's wishes with the responsibility to keep them safe. There is no set of defined questions to assess Gillick competency. That takes account of the child's understanding, ability to weigh risk and benefit, consideration of longer term factors such as effect on family life and on such things as schooling. The Fraser guidelines specifically relate only to contraception and sexual health. Register a free Taylor & Francis Online account today to boost your research and gain these benefits: College of Human and Health Science; Swansea University; Swansea, Wales, UK, Convention on the rights of the child adopted under general assembly resolution 44/25, Section 8; mental capacity act 2005, section 1, Gillick or Fraser? Re W (A minor) (Medical treatment court's jurisdiction). However, there is still a duty to keep the childs best interests at the heart of any decision, and the child or young person should be involved in the decision-making process as far as possible. endobj Usually, when a parent wants to overrule a young persons decision to refuse treatment, health professionals will apply to the courts for a final decision. A relatively young child would have sufficient maturity and intelligence to be competent to consent to a plaster on a small cut. The young persons best interests require them to receive contraceptive advice or treatment with or without parental consent. In this article, we explore the implications of adopting 'Gillick competence'drawn from healthcare lawas the relevant test of sufficient maturity in the data protection law context. Anyone who gives him consent may take it back, but the [health professional] only needs one and so long as they continue to have one they have the legal right to proceed.Citation9. Care Quality Commission. are offering contraceptive services to under 16's without parental knowledge or Edinburgh: Scottish Executive. Young people aged 16 or 17 are presumed in law, like adults, to have the capacity to consent to medical treatment. The House of Lords focused on the issue of consent rather than a notion of parental rights or parental power. The Court of Appeal reversed this decision, but in 1985 it went to the House of Lords and the Law Lords (Lord Scarman, Lord Fraser and Lord Bridge) ruled in favour of the original judgment delivered by Mr Justice Woolf: "whether or not a child is capable of giving the necessary consent will depend on the child's maturity and understanding and the nature of the consent required. What is Gillick competence? In 1983 the judgement from this case laid out criteria for establishing whether a child under has the capacity to provide consent to treatment; the so-called Gillick test. Fast-forward 35 years and Gillick competence again comes to the fore - this time to assess whether under 16s can make their own decision whether to have the Covid-19 vaccination should their parents disagree and vice versa. [Consent] protects the [health professional] from claims by the litigious whether they acquire it from their patient, who may be a minor over the age of 16 or a Gillick competent child under that age, or from another person having parental responsibilities which include a right to consent to treatment of the minor. In this context, welfare does not simply mean their physical health. It changes depending on the nature of the medical decision, e.g. Bell v Tavistock and Portman is a recent high-profile case on the lawfulness of prescribing puberty-suppressing drugs to children experiencing gender dysphoria. At paragraph 78, Sir James also noted that: However Let's make care better together. Later she had a total of 10 children. An interesting aside to the Fraser guidelines is that many[weasel words] regard Lord Scarmans judgment as the leading judgement in the case, but because Lord Frasers judgement was shorter and set out in more specific terms and in that sense more accessible to health and welfare professionals it is his judgement that has been reproduced as containing the core principles, as for example cited in the RCOG circular. Introduction. Fraser was one of the five judges of in the UK House of Lords . Gillick competency and Fraser guidelines Balancing children's rights with the responsibility to keep them safe from harm . they often talk about whether the child is 'Gillick competent' or whether they meet the 'Fraser guidelines'. Each station includes the following 3 components: Student instructions (the brief before beginning a station) Patient script (explaining the symptoms/signs the patient should report/demonstrate) A short film about the story behind Gillick Competence and Fraser Criteria. Fraser guidelines are used specifically for children requesting contraceptive or sexual health advice and treatment. In Scotland, the Age of Legal Capacity (Scotland) Act 1991 sets out when children have the legal capacity to make decisions. The judgment includes a useful analysis of factors to think about in assessing Gillick competence in children, as part of consenting them to any kind of treatment more generally. {1XeJ v'cjt]aVfD9q$|rd[gNTM-P(Y"RUUbl{ U>CA%q\6h4; Since Parliamentary legislation is superior to common law, it is the terms of Competence is related to cognitive ability and experience and may be enhanced by education, encouragement etc. At one end there are the obvious cases where parental objection would have no value in child welfare terms, for example urgent lifesaving treatment such as a blood transfusion. they are 'Gillick competent' 43R@ ~? independence. The two girls lived with their respective mothers. The right of younger children to provide independent consent is proportionate to their competence - a child's age alone is clearly an unreliable predictor of his or her competence to make decisions. Alternatively the court could direct enforcement by arranging for the removal of the child by an officer of the court for the forcible administration of the immunization. practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions. GPnotebook no longer supports Internet Explorer. [Accessed 02/02/2020]. When assessing Gillick competence for immunization, a health professional has to decide whether the child is or is not competent to make that particular decision. Where a competent child under 16 refuses a specific treatment which is in their best interests, but the parents support the . The risks, intended benefits and outcomes of the proposed immunization and alternatives to immunization, including the option of not having or delaying the immunization. On 21 May 2009, confusion arose between Gillick competence, which identifies under-16s with the capacity to consent to their own treatment, and the Fraser guidelines, which are concerned only with contraception and focus on the desirability of parental involvement and the risks of unprotected sex in that area. xVrT9+=Uq,?d{TMxR) SX>; ]c}!G:wRkB):Nns+t:jvwd%f! This was clarified The Fraser guidelines still apply to advice and treatment relating to contraception and sexual health. Courts cannot treat the matter as a case of significant harm to a child that would warrant state intervention under the Children Act 1989. People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read. Gillick competence for children under 16 years old Children under 16 years old can consent to medical treatment (but not necessarily refuse treatment) 'if they have sufficient maturity and judgement to enable them to fully understand what is proposed' - i.e. It is considered good practice for doctors and other health professionals to follow the criteria outlined by Lord Fraser in 1985 in the House of Lords' ruling in the case of Victoria Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Health Authority and Department of Health and Social Security. the young person is Gillick competent) state that all the following requirements Alteration of an established legal test would be unusual, and cause confusion and following correspondence with Victoria Gillick, Wheeler is clear that she has never suggested to anyone, publicly or privately, that [she] disliked being associated with the term Gillick competent.Citation6. ", > Find out more about assessing Gillick competency. When assessing Gillick competence for immu-nization, a health professional has to decide whether the child is or is not competent to make that particular decision. Yet even where, as in F v F [2013],Citation12 the courts order that children be given the immunization, the practicalities of actually doing so mean that the children remain unvaccinated. In early September 2021, guidance circulated to NHS trusts stated that most 12- to 15-year-olds should be deemed Gillick competent to provide [their] own consent to be vaccinated against COVID-19, despite the JCVI fail[ing] to recommend Covid-19 vaccines for healthy 12- to 15-year-olds. Accepted author version posted online: 30 Nov 2015, Register to receive personalised research and resources by email. Gillick competence is a term originating in England and Wales and is used in medical law to decide whether a child (under 16 years of age) is able to consent to their own medical treatment, without the need for parental permission or knowledge. 5 See Gillick v West Norfolk AHA [1986] AC 112, 189. A doctor can prescribe contraception to children under 16 years old if: NB: bear in mind the age of the partner and risk of sexual abuse. The judge concluded that immunization would be in the best interests of the welfare of each child. The decisions In re R (1991) and Re W (1992) (especially Lord Donaldson) contradict the Gillick decision somewhat. It is task specific so more complex procedures require greater levels of competence. under the age of 16 can consent to medical treatment if they have sufficient maturity Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab. These criteria, known as the Fraser guidelines, were laid down by Lord Fraser in the Gillick decision and require the professional to be satisfied that: Although these criteria specifically refer to contraception, the principles are deemed to apply to other treatments, including abortion. Gillick Competency 'Gillick competence' is a term originating in England and is used in medical law to decide whether a young person (under 16 years of age) is able to consent to his or her own medical treatment, without the need for parental permission or knowledge. Copyright Gillick Competence. Otherwise, someone with parental responsibility can consent for them. Fraser guidelines, on the other hand, are used specifically to decide if a child can consent to contraceptive or sexual health advice and treatment. Mental Health Matters, What is Marions Case (1982)? That said, it would rarely be appropriate or safe for a child less than 13 years of age to consent to treatment without a parents involvement. It is lawful for doctors to provide contraceptive advice and treatment without parental consent providing certain criteria are met. << /Length 5 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode >> She felt her rights as a parent had been undermined by a set of government guidelines issued to doctors, and she was . This will require an assessment on a case by case basis to determine if the child is Gillick competent. But if she cannot be persuaded to do so they can proceed to give contraceptive advice and treatment as long as certain conditions are met. In fact, the court held that parental rights did not exist, other than to safeguard the best interests of a minor. Consent guides for healthcare professionals. However, Scots Law has gone beyond Gillick with the enactment in 1991 of the Age of Legal Capacity (Scotland) Act (the 'Scottish Act'). They are named after one of the Lords responsible for the Gillick judgement but who went on to address the specific issue of giving contraceptive advice and treatment to those under 16 without parental consent. When it comes to sexual health, those under 13 are not legally able to consent to any sexual activity, and therefore any information that such a person was sexually active would need to be acted on, regardless of the results of the Gillick test. However, these are only obiter statements and were made by a lower court; therefore, they are not legally binding. and judgement to enable them fully to understand what is proposed. It underpins the propriety of the treatment and furnishes a defense to the crime of battery and civil wrong of trespass.Citation1 It must be obtained before an immunization can proceed. Kennedy & Grubb (1998) argue that children pass through 3 developmental stages on their journey to becoming an autonomous adult.Citation3. %PDF-1.3 The term has since been more widely used to help assess whether a child has the maturity to make their own decisions and to understand the . The issue before the House of Lords was only whether the minor involved could give consent. We have also added a section about safeguarding concerns. The Fraser guidelines apply specifically to advice and treatment about contraception and sexual health. Any other browser may experience partial or no support. 1 We adopt the familiar medico-legal language of the 'mature minor'. It is not just an ability to choose where the child recognizes that there is a choice to be made and is willing to make it. Consent needs to be given voluntarily. Gillick competence is a term originating in England and Wales and is used in medical law to decide whether a child (a person under 16 years of age) is able to consent to their own medical treatment, without the need for parental permission or knowledge.. >> /Font << /TT2 10 0 R /TT1 9 0 R >> /XObject << /Im1 11 0 R >> >> "Gillick competence" published on by null. 2(1) and 3(1) Mental Capacity Act 2005. Calls to 0800 1111 are free and children can also contact Childline online or read about childrens rights on the Childline website. The Geeky Medics bank of 700+ OSCE stations provides everything you need to practise your clinical skills and prepare for your OSCEs. There are no potential conflicts of interest. In practice both remedies are unlikely to be sanctioned as their impact on the child's welfare would be detrimental. As cited in Family Law Week. There is no doubt that a key barrier generally to immunisation in this age group is the reliance on parental consent before proceeding. 'Gillick competence' refers to a young person under 16 with capacity to make any relevant decision. The Gillick Competency Principle is in effect in Australia since 1992 and deals with parental guidance and information with respect to minors' use of contraceptives and decisions with respect to abortion and pregnancy. Help for adults concerned about a child Incorporated by Royal Charter. permission. The circular stated that the prescription of contraception was a matter for the doctors discretion and that they could be prescribed to under-16s without parental consent. He held that there are a small group of decisions to be made about a child that require the agreement of both parents; these include changing a child's surname, sterilisation and circumcision. Sufficient time for the assessment must be allowed by the health professional who needs to be satisfied that a child has fully understood the nature and consequences of the proposed immunization and is mature enough to take account of broader health and social factors when making their decision. The age of the children was significant in this case. If you do not want to receive cookies please do not When you are assessing Gillick competency if you have any concerns about the safety of the young person you should check whether previous child protection concerns have been raised, and explore any factors that could put them at risk of abuse. The fathers argued that the immunizations were in the children's best interests. The same child may be considered Gillick competent to make one decision but not competent to make a different decision. It is task specific so more complex procedures require greater levels of competence. Engaging with and assessing the adolescent patient. a local authority or person with an . Using the Skills of Mental Health First Aid, Some Important Facts about Mental Health Problems, Some Common Myths about Mental Health Problems, Causes of Anxiety & Stress-Related Disorders, Causes of Obsessive-Compulsion and Related Disorders, Causes of Schizophrenia and Related Disorders, Causes of Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders, Causes of Suicidal Behaviour and Self-Injury, Symptoms of Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD), Symptoms of Panic Attacks & Panic Disorder, Symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Symptoms of Depersonalisation/Derealisation Disorder, Symptoms of Dissociative Identity Disorder, Symptoms of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder, Symptoms of Body-Focused Repetitive Behavioural Disorder, Symptoms of Hair-Pulling Disorder (Trichotillomania), Symptoms of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD), Symptoms of Skin Picking Disorder (Excoriation), Symptoms of Antisocial Personality Disorder, Symptoms of Avoidant Personality Disorder, Symptoms of Borderline Personality Disorder, Symptoms of Dependent Personality Disorder, Symptoms of Histrionic Personality Disorder, Symptoms of Narcissistic Personality Disorder, Symptoms of Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder, Symptoms of Paranoid Personality Disorder, Symptoms of Schizoid Personality Disorder, Symptoms of Schizotypal Personality Disorder, Symptoms of Gender Dysphoria & Transsexualism, Symptoms of Factitious Disorder Imposed on Self, Outline of Personality & Behaviour Changes, Causes of Personality & Behaviour Changes, Evaluation of Personality & Behaviour Changes, Treatment of Personality & Behaviour Changes, Overview of Trauma- & Stress-Related Disorders, Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD) in Children, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in Children & Adolescents, Derpersonalisation/Derealisation Disorder, Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder, Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, Body-Focused Repetitive Behavioural Disorder, Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD), Psychotic Disorder Due to Another Medical Condition, Substance/Medication-Induced Psychotic Disorders, Psychological Factors Affecting Other Medical Conditions, Medical Professionals Aid in Dying (aka Assisted Suicide), Suicidal Behaviour in Children and Adolescents, Diagnostic & Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), International Classification of Diseases (ICD), Chinese Classification of Mental Disorders, Diagnosis of Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD), Diagnosis of Panic Attacks & Panic Disorder, Diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Diagnosis of Depersonalisation/Derealisation Disorder, Diagnosis of Dissociative Identity Disorder, Diagnosis of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder, Diagnosis of Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD), Diagnosis of Body-Focusesd Repetitive Behavioural Disorder, Diagnosis of Hair-Pulling Disorder (Trichotillomania), Diagnosis of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD), Diagnosis of Skin-Picking Disorder (Excoriation), Diagnosis of Antisocial Personality Disorder, Diagnosis of Avoidant Personality Disorder, Diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder, Diagnosis of Dependent Personality Disorder, Diagnosis of Histrionic Personality Disorder, Diagnosis of Narcissistic Personality Disorder, Diagnosis of Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder, Diagnosis of Paranoid Personality Disorder, Diagnosis of Schizoid Personality Disorder, Diagnosis of Schizotypal Personality Disorder, Diagnosis of Gender Dysphoria & Transsexualism, Diagnosis of Factitious Disorder Imposed on Self, Mental Health First Aid (Higher Education), FAA Level 1 Award in Awareness of First Aid For Mental Health, FAA Level 2 Award in First Aid For Mental Health, FAA Level 3 Award in Supervising/Leading First Aid For Mental Health, First Aid For Mental Health Instructor Training, Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST), More Questions Than Answers (MQTA) Training, Professional Development Award (PDA) Mental Health Peer Support, COSCA Further Steps in Counselling Skills, COSCA Counselling Supervision Certificate & Skills Course, Mental Health Awareness for Sport & Physical Activity, Level 2 Certificate in Awareness of Mental Health Problems, Level 3 Certificate in Understanding Mental Health, Mental Health & Related Organisations in Scotland, Age of Legal Capacity (Scotland) Act 1991, What is the Age of Legal Capacity (Scotland) Act 1991?